760.944.6769 info@teachce.com

Prepare for Your QME Exam

Pre-QME Exam Study Materials

ADDED VALUE FOR PHYSICIANS SEEKING QME EXAM PREP STUDY MATERIALS…

Purchase courses NOW to study
THEN you can use as QME continuing education after you pass your exam!

AND there is no extra charge for CE credits AFTER you’ve passed the QME exam!

Our home study program is very simple and very competitively priced.
Most courses (articles and videos) are 1.5 credit hours each.

Fee Schedule:
1 – 5 credit hours: $35 per hour
6 – 11 credit hours: $32.50 per hour
12 + credit hours: $30 per hour

Order individually for up to 5 credit hours or in packages for 6 credit hours ($195) or 12 credit hours ($360).

The following courses are recommended for QME exam prep:
(Click the course title to see a brief synopsis/summary)

Scroll to bottom to order

200. The Med-Legal Evaluation Dispute Resolution Process (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author : David Kizer, Esq.

The AME/QME process currently remains the method by which medical-legal evaluations are obtained and disputes are resolved under the California workers’ compensation system. Over the past decade, the legislature amended the relevant sections and the result has been a new system designed to limit the expenses of continued litigation under the process while keeping most of its unique characteristics. Nonetheless, Labor Code section 139.2 (appointment of QMEs) remains on the books as do several of the original QME statutes, albeit, in many respects, unrecognizable from their original form. With additional changes brought about to the AME/QME process first under SB 899, AB 749 and last year under SB 863, the current system, although still resembling the original QME process enacted in 1989, is vastly different. This article is intended to assist the physician in understanding his or her role within the larger context of the medical-legal process and will address this process as it now exists after the most recent legislative changes.

201. Defining Causation in CA Workers’ Comp (non-psych) (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Dana Livingstone-Lopez, Principal, TeachCE, Inc.

The intent of this article is to provide a common sense understanding of the issues associated with causation in California workers’ compensation. The article will review the following terms and the intent behind these terms in the medical legal context of CA Workers’ Compensation. Causation, AOE/COE, Aggravation, Exacerbation, Derivative effect, Compensable consequence, Specific injury, CT injury, Presumptive injury.

202. The Language of the Medical-Legal Report (4.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Dana Livingstone-Lopez-Principal, TeachCe, Inc.

How can an AME or QME best fulfill the purpose of a medical-legal evaluation, and minimize the time required to bring a workers’ compensation claim to a proper resolution? This article contains a comprehensive outline, focusing on orthopedic injuries, but helpful with all specialties, ensuring that a physician fulfills the required elements of a medical-legal report. With a complete, thorough and excellent report, the parties will know what you concluded represents your best assessment of the issues, based on reasonable medical probability given the evidence that was available to you.

203. Causation: Psychiatric Injuries under LC Section 3208 (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Raymond F. Correio, Esq.

In 2001, the WCAB issued an en banc decision in Rolda v. Pitney Bowes, Inc. (2001) 66 Cal. Comp. Cases 241. Unlike a WCAB panel decision, an en banc decision by the WCAB is binding on all Workers’ Compensation Judges in the state. Labor Code §3208.3 provides that for a psychiatric injury to be compensable, certain conditions must be satisfied. Pursuant to Labor Code section 3208.3(b)(1), for a psych injury to be considered work related, an injured worker must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that actual events of employment predominantly caused the psychological injury.

204. Cumulative Trauma Injuries (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: David Kizer, Esq.

Cumulative injury is one of the more difficult concepts for physicians in the workers’ compensation field. Physicians often must address the long-term effects of work exposure to the psyche, the back, extremities and/or internal organs and must do so while simultaneously explaining (to the satisfaction of a workers’ compensation judge) why some elements of the exposure contributed more to the overall snapshot of a worker’s disability while others did not. This article covers issues regarding dates of injury, multiple injuries and multiple employers.

205. The QME Guide to Addressing Cumulative Trauma Injuries (3 Credit Hours)

Author: Duane H. Chernow, Esq.

From another perspective, this article details the cumulative trauma and the hazard of complexities for all participants in the workers’ compensation community. Physicians are routinely asked to comment whether a worker has sustained cumulative trauma, when the period of cumulative trauma occurred, whether there are multiple periods of cumulative trauma, or to discuss a “post-termination” cumulative trauma claim. Whether or not a worker has sustained a cumulative trauma is primarily a medical question. A physician is tasked with assessing whether the job activities and work exposure, performed over a period-of-time, is “injurious,” leading to a diagnosable medical condition requiring treatment, and potentially, impairment.

206. Rating Principles and Philosophy of the AMA Guides, 5th edition – Chapters 1&2 (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Christopher Brigham, M.D.

The AMA Guides are the most widely used basis for defining permanent impairment. The Guides only assess impairment. Impairment is defined as the loss, loss of use, or derangement of any body part, organ system or organ function. In this article, the concepts of impairment evaluation and the appropriate application of the Guides are reviewed. This article specifically addresses Chapters 1 and 2 of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition.

218. Almaraz-Guzman Case Law, and Analogy (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Sherry German, CIR

This article addresses the use of the Almaraz-Guzman cases, as well as when an “analogy” can be used in the absence of that case law. When a worker is injured in California and they are determined to have reached maximum medical improvement with treatment, it is at this point the issue of permanent impairment is to be addressed in a permanent and stationary report by the primary treating physician, or a Qualified Medical Evaluator. If there is residual impairment, an impairment rating is required. The physician is directed to provide a rating based on the direct application of the instructions in the Guides. There are times, however, when an evaluator may opine that the impairment rating is either an inaccurate reflection of the impact a particular condition has on an injured worker’s ability to perform activities of daily living, or that a particular condition is simply not addressed in the Guides. This article addresses how to appropriately address this situation

219. Apportionment-The Lindh Decision: Applying the Legal Standards and Principles (4.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Raymond F. Correio, Esq.

Reporting physicians in the California Workers’ Compensation system whether treating physicians, Qualified Medical Examiners, or Agreed Medical Examiners are tasked with preparing not just medical reports but “medical-legal reports.”  To be relied upon by the parties and admissible as evidence at the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, medical-legal reports must constitute substantial evidence. In terms of assessing and evaluating a physician’s opinion on apportionment under Labor Code sections 4663 and 4664, it is critical to determine whether a physician’s opinion on apportionment in a medical-legal report or while being deposed, is based upon the correct legal standards as articulated by the WCAB and the Courts.  This article covers key points for physicians to consider when determining whether a medical-legal opinion on apportionment will constitute substantial evidence.

222. Medical Provider Networks (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: David Kizer, Esq.

Under the Reform Act passed in 2004, (SB 899) medical control under section 4600 was by and large returned to employers via the newly established Medical Provider Networks (MPNs) (Labor Code section 4613 – 4616.7) provided the insurance carriers elected to have their own MPN. The MPNs, as with any other change in the system, were criticized by some for unavailability of physicians, delays in treatment, and lack of sufficient specialists. Others pointed to the accessibility of medical care, successful return to work ratios and costs savings to the system. In a 2013 Reform Bill (SB 863) the legislature further refined the MPN networks. This article highlights the current MPN system.

224. Medical Legal Opinion as Substantial Evidence (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: Wm. J. Ordas, Esq.

“Substantial evidence” is a completely unique legal concept. When the term “substantial evidence” is used, the medical report has already met some minimum requirements of a medical-legal report. Now the question becomes whether the report is medical evidence that the court can rely upon to support a decision. This article discusses the concepts of substantial evidence, and how to apply them.

228. Understanding Presumptive Injuries (1.5 Credit Hours)

Author: David Dugan, Esq.

This article not only discusses the basic concepts of certain worker classes with certain diagnoses and the rebuttably presumptive causation issues, but also delves into the history, and politics of the statutes. In addition, new COVID-19 presumptions will be discussed.

QME Report Writing Course - Video 400: 6 Credit Hours CE (and for Part I of the Distance Learning Section of the QME report writing course)

This QME continuing education course introduces the participant to the CA work comp benefit system, PTP reporting requirements, and the dispute resolution process for both litigated and non-litigated cases. We then go into the required elements of the med-legal report including: History Taking, ADL importance, Diagnoses, Causation, Disability Status (MMI), Impairment, Apportionment with an emphasis on Escobedo, Functional Capacity/ Work Restrictions (SJDB) and Future Medical Care. Next, we go through a detailed rating analysis for a basic spine and shoulder injury. We finish with rules and regulations for filing and serving the ML report.

Plus, you can complete your order in just 3 Easy Steps!

Step 1: Click button below designating number of articles desired.

Step 2: Complete the online order form and make article selections

Step 3: Make payment online through secure payment processing site

NOTE: If you prefer to pay by check or submit credit card information via fax, please download our order form and fax or mail back with your payment. You may also call in your order to 760-944-6769

• • • •

Begin with Step 1: Choose how many credits you would like.

“I find the topics really insightful and helpful and I’ve been doing QME’s for over 20 years!”
Steve Isono, MD

I would like to purchase
6 credit hours
for $195

I would like to purchase
12 credit hours
for $360

I would like to purchase
individual credit hours for $35 per credit hour

Upon clicking your choice, you will be taken to a form to complete.

NOTE: If you change your mind about the number of credits you wish to purchase, come back to this page and make a different selection.